Fitness Testing

0

Posted by admin | Posted in Fitness | Posted on 11-06-2011

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,



For decades we have read about, took part in and wondered why fitness tests are important or necessary, but do we actually understand them, the basics, the make up, the results, probably not.

The word conjures up dread and fear in many an athlete or member of the public, no one wants to look a fool or fail at the test, some are physically sick before, during, after or all three, some need toilet breaks at every natural pause in the test.

Trainers attempt to misguide you by calling it an assessment or a base test, but at the end of the day, it boils down to a test.

What does the test cover, well that depends on your trainer, gym, fitness advisor, health professional, Some tests cover strength, aerobic output, lactic tolerance, speed, endurance others cover flexibility, VO2 max, explosive power, some are general in approach others sports and generic specific. Generally speaking, fitness tests cover strength, speed, suppleness, stamina, the outcome is the same it gives a trainer or a coach something to work from and gives the athlete or client a base line from which they can see an improvement the next time the test is conducted.

Why do we test, this question can become complicated however a test is conducted in order that a measurement or evaluation process can begin, however anyone conducting the test as a trainer or coach should ensure they are familiar with the test and understand that the test must be specific to the end result and that it can be standardized and specific to the skills required for the client or athlete and may be performed under pressure. Tests should be able to measure the required factors that are to be tested, in other words the test should be objective rather than subjective. A test should be able to measure specific requirements in a sterile environment where possible, or be as close to the initial test as possible.

Factors to consider prior to testing

o Area to be measured (e.g. recovery time)

o Method of measurement (e.g. monitor)

o Accuracy of the device (data input/output)

o Data Collection

o Data analysis

o Data to be disseminated

o Decisions to be considered in relation to collated information

o Implementation of such decisions regarding technique (if applicable) and training regimes

The above factors and considerations should be done in consultation with the person being tested and be completed at each stage.

Everyone should be aware that other factors can influence a test and need to be considered,

o Accuracy of the test

o Test conditions

o Specificity of the test

o Commitment of the client/athlete

o Caffeine intake

o Medication

o Warm Up

o Time of the test

o Fueling in respect of last meal and what time

o Clients knowledge of the test

o Effort during the test by the client or athlete

o Knowledge and skill of the tester

o Athlete/clients rest periods prior to the test

o Time elapsed since last fitness test

The test itself should be simplistic in that it will test one factor unless a sport specific technique is required to be tested. Trainers, Coaches, athletes and clients alike should be aware, No be prepared for fluctuations in the tests each time, resulting in increases and decreases in some areas.

After everything has been calculated, debated, analysed and considered, what happens to the information that is recorded. Well the information collated is only viable if all parties concerned are aware that training diaries on both sides must be maintained. The trainer or Coach requires training records in order that a programme can be monitored, corrected and implemented to increase or decrease the volume of training and specificity of it so that injuries, overtraining and de-motivation is not allowed to creep in. The client or athlete is required to keep a diary in order that they can see progression, monitor injuries, monitor fueling, moods the list can be as detailed or as sparse as is required for the standard of the records and test.

Coaches and Trainers need to understand the test they are conducting in order that the correct data will be collated from the test, failure to get the basics right will have dramatic effects on future training regimes and tests.

Information required to be collated from any test will vary dependant on various factors, a few things can help minimise some of the effecting factors, such as the test should be specific and measurable, data from training sessions both Coach/trainer led and individual training need to be collated and compared ensuring all are kept up to date this shouldn’t be a problem for any of the parties involved in the test. Factors affecting the test,

o Athlete well being (moods, composure, health)

o Training Load

o Intensity of Training

o Specificity of training

o Last race/test

o Body statistics (body fat, bmi, resting heart rate etc)

o Training Conditions (eg outside, inside, hilly, windy, hot)

o Injuries

o Responsiveness (to training load, moods, etc)

Other information that should be considered are status measurements, this can be a test, which in turn becomes part of the training regime and is used frequently to measure and observe progress within the regime. Things such as

o Event Specific

o Muscle endurance

o Plyometric strength

o Flexibility

o Mobility

After considering all of the above and the need for various types of testing how best can they be described,
Maximal Tests,
Basically record the client or athlete’s effort at race pace, which in turn means until exhaustion, tests such as

o MSFT (multi stage fitness test)

o BFT (Military basic Fitness Test)
These tests do have disadvantages such as athlete commitment to the test, injury or overload.

Sub maximal tests are designed to test an athlete below their maximal effort in turn a coach or trainer can make a generalization about the results beyond those areas tested. As with maximal testing there are disadvantages such as small measurement recorded inaccurately can result in large discrepancies owing to the generalisation of the result, also generalisation in comparison to the test.

What kind of tests are there and how do we know which ones are right for us as individuals or as trainers/coaches. Basically some of it will and is trial and error although the test should be specific to the outcome, and tests criteria should remain constant at each testing face. No matter what part of your body, or Cardio system you wont to test their is a test out their.

Rugby Fitness Training – A Scientific Approach

0

Posted by admin | Posted in Fitness | Posted on 15-01-2010

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,




A periodized approach to rugby fitness training


Rugby union traditionally was a sport that was played by amateurs who trained like amateurs. Since the advent of professionalism which has trickled down throughout the league structures it is now common place to see the majority of rugby players training in their own time. As is seen with many people in the gym the new found enthusiasm for fitness may not paralleled by the same level of knowledge about how to train.

Rugby produces some unique training requirements not seen in other sports. It is a sport that caters for all types of physiques and places demands on almost all the bodies’ physical characteristics.

I will not go into an in-depth discussion of the various requirements of rugby and variations for each position. However, I will briefly review the main requirements for success. The demands of rugby are varied and I could almost list every physical ability and say it impacts upon performance, however the main factors are:

• Aerobic power – more specifically a high aerobic power over a pure steady state aerobic base e.g. a good 6 minute run test score more important than good 10 km time. (Obviously these two are highly integrated but still are different).

• Lactate tolerance – The key limiting factor during play, affects both aerobic power and speed endurance.

• Speed – More specifically acceleration and repeated sprint speed endurance.

• Agility – The ability to decelerate and change direction or move in a non linear direction.

• Strength – Both maximum strength and speed strength and as any sport requires a strong core as a foundation.

To add to this you could easily point out maximum speed is important in many situations and you can never be called too fast, but in general it is not too decisive. Muscles size is also not hugely important to success as it is your strength, absolute, relative and fast speed that is more important. Though one factor affecting maximum strength is of course muscle cross section area. I have not mentioned above about flexibility but just like core strength it is a fundamental that needs to be used to restore ideal posture and muscle lengths. How much flexibility is optimal past these ideal lengths is an issue of much debate and beyond the scope of this article.

To effectively cover all the main attributes a rugby player needs to optimize performance he must cover six main types of training methods:

• Aerobic training – To develop lactate tolerance and aerobic power.

• Sprint training- To enhance acceleration and repeated sprint speed endurance.

• Resistance training- To build maximum and fast speed strength.

• Agility training – to learn effective mutli-directional movements and changes of pace.

• Plyometric training – To support speed strength in linear and multi directional movements.

• Core and flexibility training – To create the underlying foundations of all the above training.

These methods will develop all the attributes that are stressed on the rugby field. These can be combined into three sessions, a track session – Sprint training, agility and plyometrics, a gym session – Strength and core training and an aerobic session. This does not need to take up your whole life but just a few hours per week if following an optimal training routine.

To go through each training method is of course beyond the length of this article and is comprehensively covered in my book1. Ignoring the specific details of each training method we can instead focus upon the underlying design of the training programmes within each of the six methods above.

Periodization principles

Most of us are aware of periodization, yet so few people integrate this fully into their training programmes. I believe this is due to the complexity of the theory. The reason periodization was created was to:

1) Maximise the response from the training stimulus.

2) Allow continuous gains to be made from week to week and year to year.

3) Avoid injury and overtraining.

Periodization seems to suffer from an all or nothing approach, either a scientifically designed programme is used or nothing is implemented. However most trainers are using the theory without knowing it. Forget macro cycles, training variables and such, if viewed on a sliding scale then the most basic form of periodization is setting a new programme every month. Which most people do, the next level up would be applying a certain type of training for a few weeks then changing the focus, e.g. an endurance phase then strength phase. This again is easy to implement. How far to advance the system up to the traditional theories of step load progression of intensity and macro, meso cycles, weekly load variation etc is dependent on many a factor including the athlete you are working with.

I present here a method of using periodization that can be implemented by trainers or players alike. The key to using periodization is to determine the training phase and setting appropriate training parameters. Then using these you can cycle the parameters over the duration of that training phase.

Let me explain, as an example, say you are looking to increase the muscle size of the prime movers used in rugby, this is known as specific hypertrophy phase using traditional periodization terminology2. The general guidelines for this would be 6 – 12 reps with around 3 minutes rest using the necessary exercises. A simple way to introduce periodization would be, over a 6 week phase to vary the reps as below:

Week 1 & 2 12 Reps

Week 3 & 4 9 reps

Week 5 & 6 6 reps


This is using the foundation principles of program design, it is increasing the intensity while decreasing the volume – Classic periodization!3. This method can and should be extended across all the training phases within your resistance training routines.

Let’s take a look at a typical off-season. To maximise the gains from resistance training you would build a base early in the off-season followed by focusing on increasing muscle size then developing maximum strength and converting this to power so your are physically at your biggest, strongest and most explosive by the start of the next in-season.

To do this you could have four training phases, preparation, hypertrophy, strength and power phase.

Off-season

Preparation Hypertrophy Strength Power

With each phase you can associate the traditional training parameters to achieve the goal of that phase’s training. For example, preparation4 uses sub maximal lifts for between 5 to 15 reps, hypertrophy uses 6 – 12 reps to failure, strength 1 – 5 rep max and power for sake of argument 2 – 6 reps with sub-maximal loads (please note there are many methods for power development beside this).

Using these phases is already putting the science of program design into practise. This can be further enhanced by varying the reps within each phase. This will maximise the training response over the phase:

Season – Off-season

Phase – Preparation – Hypertrophy – Strength – Power

Reps – 15 – 10 – 5 – 12 – 9 – 6 – 5 – 3 – 1 – 6 – 4 – 2

Through such simple variations of one training variable you have introduced intensity and volume manipulation throughout the course of the off-season and within the phases themselves. This will produce more optimal results. For each training phase a different exercise routine would be followed to introduce specificity and you could also vary the rest periods to further extrapolate the volume, specificity and intensity relationships.

If you now start introducing recovery weeks you begin to incorporating the other needs of periodization – avoiding overtraining and maximising adaptation. This can be furthered enhanced by using specified variations in training intensity within the weekly micro cycles, e.g. heavy and light days and before you know it you are applying the main bulk of periodization and reaping its benefits on athletic performance.

The above serves to exemplify how to easily introduce periodization into resistance training, of course these principles need to be taken and applied to the other training methods also, e.g. aerobic, agility, plyometrics etc. Again the exercises within each phase and variation in training parameters, e.g. volume, intensity need to be designed and altered to mediate the required changes across the off-season or during the in-season.

If this sounds too simple then just remember that periodization is a relative rather than an absolute. It is about maximising the response from training while ensuring the athletes does not suffer injury or over training. The benefits of using an undulating model versus a linear model5 or the fitness fatigue theory over classical6 are all well and good, but the crux of the matter is putting in place a periodized routine of some sorts. This can be done by:

• Applying training phases during the year to achieve a certain training outcome.

• Varying the reps, rest, intensity over the training phase.

• Using recovery weeks, days and techniques to ensure the body is fresh.

This is all covered in my book Rugby fitness training: A twelve month conditioning programme. Though it is a book designed for rugby players the principles outlined above are central to its theme. It will teach you how to take the general principles and apply them to you or your clients training routine.

In the programme section I have added three rugby programmes, these serve just to as an example of a possible routine, the success of the programme will rely more on how you as the coach manipulate the training variables within each training phase and change the training between the individual phases.